© 2024 MICHIGAN PUBLIC
91.7 Ann Arbor/Detroit 104.1 Grand Rapids 91.3 Port Huron 89.7 Lansing 91.1 Flint
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Enviro group: CO2 capture legislation has problems

One environmental group is concerned that leaks, a lack of training for first responders, and other issues should be addressed before passing legislation paving the way for capturing carbon dioxide and then storing it underground.
/
Adobe Stock
One environmental group is concerned that leaks, a lack of training for first responders, and other issues should be addressed before passing legislation paving the way for capturing carbon dioxide and then storing it underground.

Michigan lawmakers are considering legislation that could pave the way for capturing carbon dioxide emissions and storing them underground. One environmental group has concerns.

A coalition of business, labor, academic experts, and some environmental groups support the carbon capture and store legislation.

The bills are sponsored by Democratic Senator Sean McCann (SB 1131), Republican Senator Joe Bellino (SB 1132), and Democratic Senator John Cherry (SB 1133).

See more about the legislation and carbon, capture, utilization, and storage here.

But the Michigan Environmental Council (MEC) is concerned the legislation does not take precautions to respond to problems such as leaks from pipes transporting CO2 in liquid or gaseous form or leaks as it is pumped underground.

“That leaking can cause carbonic acid to form, which can then leach minerals and heavy metals from the ground, such as arsenic and uranium, and can have really big impacts potentially on groundwater and drinking water,” said Charlotte Jameson, Chief policy officer for MEC.

Jameson noted the nation’s first commercial carbon dioxide capture project in Illinois has had two leaks. She said the company did not notify authorities.

The MEC also would like to see money included in the legislation to train first responders called to the scene of a leak. Another concern is the belief that the legislation would leave the state liable for any damage or injuries.

“How do we do it in a way that it’s got a lot of safeguards and protections built into place so that we can ensure that we’re not going to see water contamination or public health concerns going forward,” Jameson said.

She hopes legislators do not pass the bills in the lame duck session and instead do further work on the legislation next year.

Lester Graham reports for The Environment Report. He has reported on public policy, politics, and issues regarding race and gender inequity. He was previously with The Environment Report at Michigan Public from 1998-2010.
Related Content